OULC slam Labour’s ‘consistently inadequate’ responses to anti-semitism

first_imgThe Oxford University Labour Club (OULC) have labelled Jeremy Corbyn’s apology regarding allegations of anti-semitism as insufficient, adding to the growing number of voices pushing for a stronger response from the Labour leader.Corbyn’s statement, issued earlier this week, followed accusations made against both the Labour Party and Corbyn himself by the Jewish Leadership Council.Corbyn claimed that he “will never be anything other than a militant opponent of anti-Semitism,” yet also criticised what he called “the continuing dispossession of the Palestinian people.”While OULC “welcomed” Corbyn’s apology, they stressed that they did not view it to be “a sufficient response.”The statement, written by the club co-chairs Ray Williams and Anisha Faruk, calls on him to “reflect thoroughly on his own actions as well as to apologise for the party’s consistently inadequate response to internal antisemitism.”“We recognise that we all need to more to raise our awareness against antisemitism, malicious or subconscious, and press the Labour leadership to take stronger action to tackle it within the party.“If we fail to respond robustly to hatred and bigotry we betray our fundamental Labour values of solidarity, tolerance and respect.“It must never be forgotten that Jewish people are, and always have been, an integral part of the Labour movement”The statement also made reference to OULC’s past issues with anti-semitism, stating that: “Our club has tried to learn from its mistakes and so must our party. We will continue to do all that we can to make sure that the Club remains a friendly and safe environment.”Former OULC co-chair, Alex Chalmers, resigned in 2016 in response to a considerable number of members having what he described as “some sort of problem with Jews”.He said that this was shown through their endorsement of Israeli Apartheid Week, use of anti-semitic language, and expressions of sympathy with Hamas and other anti-semitic terrorist groups.This led to an investigation into alleged anti-Jewish sentiments in the club. The report concluded that while the club does not appear to be “institutionally anti-Semitic, behaviour and language that would once have been intolerable is now tolerated.”In response to OULC’s statement, Oxford University Jewish Society (JSoc) president, Jacob Greenhouse, told Cherwell: “JSoc are very impressed with the OULC statement and are happy to see that OULC are committed to working with us and with the Labour movement to help confront antisemitism.”last_img read more

World Athletics bans prototype shoes after Nike row

first_imgWorld Athletics on Friday announced a ban on using prototype shoes in competition after a recent spate of world records set by athletes wearing the Nike Vaporfly trainers. “From April 30 2020, any shoe must have been available for purchase by any athlete on the open retail market (online or in store) for a period of four months before it can be used in competition,” athletics’ governing body said in a statement. World Athletics has banned prototype shoes like the ones worn by Kipchoge in his successful attempt to break the two-hour marathon barrier The basic Nike Vaporfly has a carbon blade in the sole, which stores and releases energy on each step, and air cushions. Kenyan marathon world record holder Eliud Kipchoge broke the two-hour mark for the distance in Vienna last October wearing a new Vaporfly prototype with three carbon blades in the sole and four air cushions. But that would be banned under the new rules which state that shoes cannot contain more than one “rigid embedded plate or blade” of any material, although shoes with spikes can have an additional plate “for the purpose of attaching spikes to the sole”. Kenya’s Brigid Kosgei broke Paula Radcliffe’s women’s marathon world record in Chicago with a time of 2hr 14min 04sec, wearing the basic one-blade version that has been available in shops since 2017. Promoted Content10 Unusual (And Stunning) Human TraitsWho Is The Most Powerful Woman On Earth?7 Universities In The World With The Highest Market ValueThese TV Characters Proved That Any 2 People Can Bury The HatchetBest Car Manufacturers In The World10 Inventions That Make Us Question Humanity2020 Tattoo Trends: Here’s What You’ll See This YearWhich Celebrity Endorsement Deals Were Worth The Most?Couples Who Celebrated Their Union In A Unique, Unforgettable WayWho Earns More Than Ronaldo?The Most Exciting Cities In The World To Visit10 Risky Jobs Some Women Do “It is not our job to regulate the entire sports shoe market but it is our duty to preserve the integrity of elite competition by ensuring that the shoes worn by elite athletes in competition do not offer any unfair assistance or advantage,” said World Athletics president Sebastian Coe. “As we enter the Olympic year, we don’t believe we can rule out shoes that have been generally available for a considerable period of time, but we can draw a line by prohibiting the use of shoes that go further than what is currently on the market while we investigate further.” Read Also: Australian Open: Thiem outguns Zverev in four sets to reach first final Kipchoge had defended claims he only managed to break two hours due to his footwear. “I trained hard,” he told British newspaper the Daily Telegraph. “In Formula 1, Pirelli issues the tyres to all the cars but Mercedes are the best one. Why? It’s the engine. It’s the person. “It’s the person who is running, not the shoe. It’s the person driving, not the person making the tyres.” FacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmail分享 center_img Loading… last_img read more